I haven’t used Diaspora yet. I have heard people say that its not really good and Friendica is better, which I also have never tried. Whats your experience with these platforms?

    • Travis Skaalgard@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      That’s not what I said. I dislike this idea that is emerging that the fediverse = activitypub. Anything that is FOSS and federated is part of the Fediverse. Just because you can’t use Mastodon to interact with it doesn’t mean it isn’t part of the Fediverse. Diaspora is the fediverse, Matrix is the fediverse, Lemmy is the fediverse etc etc. It’s all the Fediverse.

      • Tmpod@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        I believe this idea is wrong. The definition of the a fediverse (according to Wikipedia) is

        "an ensemble of federated (i.e. interconnected) servers that are used for web publishing (i.e. social networking, microblogging, blogging, or websites) and file hosting, but which, while independently hosted, can communicate with each other. " 1

        Yes, a fediverse.
        Matrix chats can’t understand Mastodon, Mastodon can’t understand Matrix chats, therefore they cannot exist in the same fediverse. Matrix chats can understand Cactus comments and vice versa, they speak the same language (the Matrix protocol), so they coexist in the Matrix fediverse. Same thing can be said about the Diaspora protocol.

        It just so happens that ActivityPub is a W3C backed protocol and the most popular for social media, so people refer to its fediverse as “The” fediverse.
        I agree there ought to be a name change (call it ActivityPub Fediverse or something along those lines), but I can’t agree that Matrix and Diaspora are part of it.

        Edit: Add Wikipedia page reference.

        • poVoq@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          It really isn’t that clear cut. Lemmy for example uses ActivityPub, yet right now at least you can not interact with with non-Lemmy instances. Hubzilla on the other hand speaks three protocols, Zot, AP and also Diaspora… and XMPP has a Mastodon gateway.

          I think Fediverse is more about the idea and a common cause than a protocol.

          • Tmpod@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            I see your point yeah. I guess we should call Fediverse to the collective of all federated software, which is then subdevided into protocol-based networks, where services can interoperate.

          • TheConquestOfBed@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            It seems like most activitypub apps have a goal of connecting with masto for visibility, but a lot don’t get that far because of development time.