• missandry351@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    Because the former Soviet Union, with all its defects, never gave much of a shit about gender roles, you are going to learn science even if it takes your whole life. I guess some of that cultured stayed after Ussr collapsed

    • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Read Alexandra Kollontai, the liberation of women from household oppression was something they actually did give a shit about and was intentional.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Didn’t it end up that women were liberated to work same as men but also at home they had the home work too. Russia never really lost that patriarchal family dynamic.

    • eistari@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      They very much cared about gender roles, but also pretty early figured out that women in the workforce are economically beneficial. So the situation was (and unfortunately is) that women are shamed if they don’t earn money OR don’t look good OR don’t cook/clean/care about children. I am honestly fascinated how average woman manages these three shifts. In academia btw there’s still a huge gender bias even when women make the majority of students and generally perform better.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Women were supposed to perform all the domestic labour. All of it. That myth of liberated soviet woman shatters the second you learn about any aspect of the soviet existance.
      30 years later, and I still can’t convince my mom that doing all the domestic work and be toe-to-toe with men in a workplace isn’t something all women are just have to do.