• PP44@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Sure hope this is how things will go. But I fear the monopoly is already too powerful…

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I wonder if at some point it would just make sense to have a split between commercial and non-commerical web. Chrome could become just an app you use to do things like banking and online shopping, while Firefox could be a browser you use to access things like the Fediverse.

      • PP44@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Interesting take, never thought of this that way but it seems really realistic the way you put it ! That is already happening with mail where the big mail servers start to “defederate” by straight up denying mail from servers they do not recognize. Maybe the day will come where web servers will just send data to recognized browser (already kind of happening)

        But what frighten me is hardware discrimination. In the name of security, I think we may soon come to the point where some servers will discriminate against “non-verified hardware”.

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Some people are kind of already living that romance with the Gemini protocol. So, that’s separate from the whole HTTP/HTML web and you need a Gemini browser to access it. The markup language is rather similar to Markdown, so the fanciest tech you have available, are images and ASCII art. Which is pretty hostile to advertising.

        As far as I could tell, if you enjoy reading blog posts, this is actually quite a cozy little corner of the internet.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah, Gemini is an interesting experiment and completely agree it’s a very good solution for text based static content. Protocol being restrictive ends up being a feature in this context.

      • PP44@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Let’s hope you are right. I agree that things can change, but I have to admit I’m quite worried.