Where do we draw the line though? Humans assign emotions to all kinds of inanimate things: plush animals, the sky, dead people, fictional characters etc. We can’t give all of those the rights of a conscious being, so we need to have some kind of objective way to look at it.

Fundamentally impossible to know. I’m not sure how you’d even find a definition for “suffering” that would apply to non-living entities. I don’t think the comparison to animals really holds up though. Humans are animals and can feel pain, so of course the base assumption for other animals should be that they do as well. To claim otherwise, the burden should be to prove that they don’t. Meanwhile, Humans are fundamentally nothing like an LLM, a program running on silicon predicting text responses based on a massive dataset.

“Advertise” to me implies a commercial purpose. So for a Lemmy community “promote” sounds more appropriate IMO.

I don’t really see the similarity, the two letters at the end? If so, seriously? I see it as a lighthearted way to refer to AI in a way that makes fun of people who think it’s this amazing technology of the future, when it’s really just a fancy statistics machine that can’t separate between truth and fiction.

Not quite. Larian also wants to use it for concept art, which is not the same thing as placeholder assets. To give you a bit of context, the standard for placeholder textures at the software development companies I worked so far has mostly been “vaguely fitting images you found on Google”.

This is only in regions where they’re being forced to do this. And if the implementation in Japan is anything like what they did in the EU, it’s essentially worthless, as there are way to many hoops to jump through for alternate app stores to make it practical or useful at all.

Looks like it’s this.

I don’t know about him specifically, but I’d say it’s a shift in opinion that many of us went through. 2008 was a very different world. Amazon wasn’t quite the evil empire it is today. It was one of the only usable online shops, leagues ahead of almost everything else available.

No idea if it’s unique to Germany, but one thing I always roll my eyes at is people losing their minds when a school cafeteria decides to have a meat-free day or even when it does serve meat, but not pork.

Except for the “developing concept art” bit. That’s not some unimportant intern’s work and does have the potential to displace artists. And while no AI-generated content may make it into the game, it does suggest that there will be art in the game that’s based on the AI-generated content. That’s what concept art is for, after all.

I generally agree with the notion, but it’s a bit rich coming from the man who declared the greens their “main enemy” instead of the far-right AfD, whose populist rhetoric he instead tried to copy. I hope this is him finally realizing who the real enemies are and that we need to actually do something about them.

Welcome back! BTW, there were some users wondering whether you’re okay some months ago: https://pawb.social/post/33129287

Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 is excellent.

My company has 2 CEOs. One of them doesn’t ever really talk about AI. The other one is personally obsessed with the topic. His picture on Teams is AI generated and every other day, he posts some random AI tutorial or news into work channels. His client presentations are mostly written by ChatGPT. But luckily, nothing is being forced on us developers. The company is very hands-off in general (some may say disorganized) and we can pretty much use any tools and methods we choose, as long as we deliver good results. I personally use AI only occassionally, mostly for quick prototyping in languages and frameworks I’m unfamiliar with. None of the other devs are very enthusiastic about AI either.

Nobody wants to somehow homogenize Europe into a single culture. A European federation would not be an ethnostate, quite the opposite. A European federation should preserve the many things that make our different cultures unique, while celebrating the many things we have in common and give us the opportunity to assert our shared interests on the world stage. Several multi-language and multi-cultural countries already exist in Europe, like Switzerland, Belgium, Italy and the UK. And it’s not like the current border somehow neatly separate cultures. Living in South-Western Germany, I have culturally more in common with a person from Alsace than one from Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.

Every American knows what CNN, WSJ and USA Today are. How many Poles know what the BBC is?

Probably most TBH.

What kind of allegiance do you expect a normal citizen from any EU country to have to this federation?

I’ve travelled all over Europe and I love this continent and its people. Why should I feel more allegiance to my country?

There are 27 armies and the same number of military procurement systems in the EU. If a European federation is possible as you claim, why aren’t you taking steps to have just one?

Me personally? How would I? Of course I’d like that to happen, and some steps are being taken in that direction. Federalism aside, I see that as an absolute necessity for our defence. You think small separate countries can defend themselves from Russia, China or the US?

Browsing various art platforms, when I see a user where I’m not entirely sure if their art is AI (usually I think I can tell immediately though), I check how old their profile is. If it’s older than 2024, I check how their art from before that year looks. If there hasn’t been a sudden and radical shift in style and skill, I consider the art human-made. Otherwise, likely AI.

That method might be a tad unfair to artists who are only starting out now, but I don’t know of any better way.

!buildapc@lemmy.world

Common misconception. “Beamtenbeleidigung” is not a thing in law, just regular Beleidigung, which can be directed at anyone and is punishable with a fine or theoretically even up to a year in prison. Public interest needs to be determined though, which is more likely to be the case with officials, famous people etc.

Of course. As I said, I’m not trying to support or defend the methods they used here. I’m just saying that when you’re insulting a policeman, at a demonstration or anywhere, you’ve committed a crime and will be arrested. It’s not a smart move. The title here implies that he was arrested for “calling them out” or that it’s about the demonstration being Pro-Palestine, but this is the fastest way to get arrested at any demonstration.

I don’t know if it’s different now, but I didn’t have to provide anywhere near that amount of information when I went to China a few years ago. Nor did they search through any of my electronic devices.

Arrest is only allowed under certain circumstances

Indeed, but one of those circumstances is being caught in the act of comitting a crime, as was the case here.

The proportions have to be maintained, too.

True, the method used could well have been out of proportion. But he shouldn’t be surprised to have been arrested, that would have happened at any demonstration if you decide to insult a cop.