So I guess Dobrindt is also taking care of the remaining Afghan people who helped support the Bundeswehr during their mission and were promised place in Germany, right? RIGHT?

Let’s see how they spin it this time to put the blame on the EU.

Both. We can’t perceive the world exactly the same way as another person. Therefore, what we make of it is also individual and every point of view is valid in its own way.

Take a Rorschach-Test, for example. There are examples most people can agree on, they show a specific thing. Others are wildly subjective. What a creator intends to invoke with their creation and what the audience receives are not necessarily the same, but that doesn’t invalidate one side’s interpretation.

would be stored there for 30 years while new methods were developed

Hmh, where have I heard this before? *cough* Atomic waste *cough*

• gets rejected at the border because officer doesn’t believe person doesn’t have social media accounts
• ???
• no profit

Removing people from their social environment is one of the best tools to radicalize them. See every cult ever.

According to the Federal Bureau of Statistics the median income in 2024 in Germany was € 52,159 . 60% of this value is € 31,295.4. A worker with a 40 hour work week and the mandates 28 days of paid vacation days worked 1784 hours in 2024. Therefore by dividing 60% of the median income per year with hours worked per year we get the targeted hourly pay: € 17.55/h.

I am not sure why this seems to be an impossible task for you.

!rentnerfahrenindinge@feddit.org

This entirely depends on your point of view.

We also passively vote on the law by electing the people in charge of passing it. Why not also vote on the people interpreting it?

How else do you want to fill the position for a judge? By a panel of experts? Who decides who is part of this panel? Who decides what the selection process is?

Effectively there is a popular voting process somewhere. The debate is only where exactly in the chain.

I’ve read that 80% of Germans are in favour of legalizing assisted suicide. Yet every proposed law failed since the BVerfG rules the ban illegal.

So politicians do not necessarily represent the population.

What’s the movie/short story called again?

Do not underestimate our new governments ability to stretch logic and reason. They have been learning from the best in the last decade! *cough* Trump *cough*

Our new minister of the interiors is openly ignoring our courts because he believes they are a) wrong and b) not authorised to rule on the matter.

Half of the country.

It’s not that bad … yet. 🫣

Waht the fuck France?

No fuck, oui?

“insufficient voltage control capacity” on the system that day, due in part to a programming flaw

Human error not “faulty renewables”

He formed a coalition with Scholz’s party after the election to become chancellor. That’s what went “wrong.” But he said “no limitations” AFTER forming this coalition, knowing full well that Taurus will never be sent as long as he needs the SPD (Scholz’s party) to stay in power.

And saying no later is better because … ?

Really? First he says all limitations are off the table, and next that Taurus will not be sent.

Merz is a disaster on so many levels …

Is it cultural appropriation if a state appropriates the work of an artist because it deems it culturally relevant? /s 🤔

On a more serious note: This could have probably served as a blueprint for Big Mouse if it had been successful.