tl;dr: Intel and AMD are not selling their processors to Russia, and processors from Russian companies cannot be manufactured as Taiwan is banning TSMC from doing so, while Russia can only produce chips up to a 90 nm process.

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    First, Russia is able to produce their own domestic chips, second Russia can import chips from CSMC which is in China and doesn’t care about US sanctions one bit. What I’m reading here is that Chinese foundries just got a big new market opened up to them without any competition.

    • Amicese
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Novliberalisma imperioj ĵetas sian piedojn.

    • @lxvi@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The article mentioned Russia’s domestic production. It said their domestic factories can only produce 90nm chips, which is believable.

      As far as the latter part of what you said is concerned, that was my same takeaway. China proper is the second most advanced manufacturer of transistors and has good trade relations with Russia; to the extent that their earlier declaration of friendship read more like a marriage declaration. These western sanctions only amount to Chinese protectionism. Its a huge boon to Chinese and Russian technological development and cooperation.

    • @wabooti@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      -11 year ago

      First, producing silicone monocrystals does not equal the ability to produce modern chips. The only somewhat significant semiconductor producer from Russia, Mikron Group, announced in 2020 that they would start using the 65nm process, a process that has been available since 2005.

      So the biggest domestic manufacturer is 15-20 years behind the West and mainland Chinese manufacturers have a global market share of 8% compared to Taiwan’s 66% (and American lap dog Korea with 17%).

      Sorry to break it to you buddy but its not looking good for the Russians

    • @lxvi@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      Lol, you’re right. This news is terribly irrelevant for an article published last week. Why even write it? Western nations have been suffering from a chip shortage for over a year and are rushing to establish domestic production. This feels like more displacement. Taiwan is the most advanced manufacturer of transistors, but China proper is the second most advanced manufacturer; considering Taiwan is recognized as a province of China and the separatist lost the recent elections, the west is in serious trouble rather than Russia. Russia never de-industrialized, and the core of Russia’s industrial base is under central control; while the US has de-industrialized, and it’s only means of central control is bribing it’s capitalist base, which is more interested in banking fraud than production.

  • @jackalope@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    Is this related to China also limiting cpus to Russia? I read something about that earlier this week.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      China isn’t limiting CPU sales to Russia. The article that’s been going around talks about China restricting foreign sales of a particular type of chip, and that has nothing to do with Russia.

      • @jackalope@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        thank you for the info. The article I said highlighted it as a potential point of conflict with Russia but I’m not deeply into that subject so I don’t really know.

    • @lxvi@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      China isn’t sanctioning Russia in any way; moreover, at the start of the war Chinese companies stepped in to alleviate some of the worst setbacks of Western sanctions. I think it’s fair to say that Russia would be in a far less favorable position without the support China has shown. I wouldn’t expect that situation to change any time soon. There’s always an innuendo of some brewing conflict between the two, but it’s just wishful thinking on the part of the authors.