How do different practices in software lead to different models of society? Software is intangible, but its results often are not. The decisions we make about what type of software we use have real-life effects. There is a type of software that benefits the common good, and that is Free Software., The transparency and adaptability of Free Software enhance cooperation, inclusivity, and self-determination. This leads us to a society with stronger democratic procedures and community spirit., If you want to dive deeper into this, the script of the video is based on a talk at FOSDEM 2020 given by Matthias Kirschner, President of the FSFE. It reflects the core values of software freedom and pleads for more respect and diversity in Free Software communities.
The public domain is only as public as you allow it to remain. Looser licenses like MIT/Apache enable privatization over time of public knowledge. The copyleft is much closer to a socialist/anarchist abolition of property: goods are collective and can be used for any personal purpose, as long as the communal properties are ensured.
I’m sold more in the public domain direction
“The public domain is only as public as you allow it to remain”
Well I don’t find copyleft to be fully public, as it forces people to use the license and worry about abiding by its terms and about using compatible licenses and all of those kind of issues
“The copyleft is much closer to a socialist/anarchist abolition of property”
It’s not though in my view, it’s basically enforced by government and closes off commercial use sometimes and forces people to go along with whatever the rules are with the license; it’s like an authoritarian socialism, and definitely not anarchist as that would allow you to do whatever you want with the code (public domain would be anarchist, to me)
So the forced socialism isn’t really anarchist I guess is what I mainly don’t like, it probably requires just getting rid of intellectual property / IP altogether though to have actual / complete software freedom
I’m not aware of a single instance of government enforcement of copyleft (although there’s been threats of legal actions), and copyleft certainly does not prevent commercial use at all.
The only rule of the license is “don’t change the license”, i.e. let everyone enjoy the same rights you did. If you find that authoritarian, i don’t know what to say.
I agree in principle (if we abolish all other property with it :)) but as an isolated measure it would not be efficient. Hardware manufacturers would still write crappy Windows drivers instead of releasing their hardware data sheets unless they’re compelled by law, and what good does it do us to share compiled binaries if we can’t access the source code? In fact, the situation may even be worse because without the threat of copyleft enforcement shady corporations may in fact just keep violating copyleft.
It all depends on the specifics, but removing intellectual property without abolishing capitalism is in my view insignificant.