Cars used to be entirely mechanical objects. With hard work and expertise, basically any old vehicle could be restored and operated: On YouTube, you can watch a man drive a 1931 Alvis to McDonaldâs. But the car itself was stuck in time. If the automaker added a feature to the following yearâs model, you just didnât get it. Things have changed. My Model 3 has few dials or buttons; nearly every feature is routed through the giant central touch screen. Itâs not just Tesla: Many new carsâand especially electric carsâare now stuffed with software, receiving over-the-air updates to fix bugs, tweak performance, or add new functionality.
In other words, your car is a lot like an iPhone (so much so that in the auto industry, describing EVs as âsmartphones on wheelsâ has become a go-to clichĂ©.) This has plenty of advantagesâthe improved navigation, the fart noisesâbut it also means that your car may become worse because the software is outdated, not because the parts break. Even top-of-the-line phones are destined to become obsoleteâstill able to perform the basic functions like phone calls and texts, but stuck with an old operating system and failing apps. The same struggle is now coming for cars.
Software-dependent cars are still new enough that itâs unclear how they will age. âItâs becoming the ethos of the industry that everyoneâs promising a continually evolving car, and we donât yet know how theyâre going to pull that off,â Sean Tucker, a senior editor at Kelley Blue Book, told me. âCars last longer than technology does.â The problem with cars as smartphones on wheels is that these two machines live and die on very different timescales. Many Americans trade in their phone every year and less than 30 percent keep an iPhone for longer than three years, but the average car on the road is nearly 13 years old. (Tesla didnât respond to a request for comment about how its cars age.)



I think what is being implied is EVs will have planned obsolescence even if they are perfectly working fine, like smartphones. Whether it be irreplaceable batteries, or software updates not being backward compatible. Regular cars are capable of lasting until they literally break down and die.
Regular cars have been increasingly slaved to the on-board computer since the 1990s though.
You can only buy a few modern cars that donât send constant telemetry back to the manufacturer, for example â just like televisions.
Thereâs different levels of computerized control though. Would fuel injection and other modern efficiency and safety systems be possible without a main computer? I wouldnât trade my days with simple mechanical cars and carburetors from the learning experience, but I also wouldnât go back if I had a choice.
The line crossed was being connected to work, not computers themselves. I agree that the modern car market is a minefield in whether or not thereâs anything you could get that isnât dependent in some way on being online. Buy used, thereâs still stuff out there that will give long life, has been tested by the first owners, and doesnât have the manufacturerâs grip on it.
Thatâs literally their point?
These donât exist anymore. If they do, it doesnât matter if they move by burning fossils or electricity. Itâs not a matter of EVs being movable smart devices that will be left behind eventually, itâs a matter of cars being like that.
No batteries are irreplaceable. It would be really stupid to do that because then the OEM would have to throw away the entire vehicle when there was any sort of battery issue. Software updates have nothing to do with the powertrain. Itâs not an EV problem.
LOL. Both neighbors on either side of me lease Teslas and both have had the cars replaced because Tesla could not fix them.
âŠand? Do you think lemon laws were created before or after Tesla?