• Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Framework:

    • doesn’t offer Linux preinstalled
    • doesn’t ship fully assembled laptops without Windows (only the “DIY” edition you must assemble yourself can ship without Windows)
    • just now (April 2022, over two years late) finally put up a Linux compatibility page which currently describes Ubuntu 21.10 as “🤔 medium difficulty”
    • doesn’t have a free software BIOS or EC firmware

    Meanwhile companies like Purism, System76, and Starlabs are shipping modern laptops with various distros preinstalled, never shipping windows, shipping coreboot, and (in the case of the first two, at least, and especially the first) funding the development of free software.

    • NFT screenshotter@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      ok? but their laptops are entirely repairable and upgradable down to the CPU. The other 3 just repackage blank laptops with their name and bios on it and call it a day.

    • krolden@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      And the ‘modular’ features are just USBC adapters in a fancy case. I dont see the appeal.

      • morrowind@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        They are swappable ports using thunderbolt. + the screen, bezel, keyboard, touchpad, battery, wifi module, mainboard etc. are basically all easily accessible.

        • krolden@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Most of that is already easily swappable on any laptop granted it isn’t soldered to the board. Not to mention most of that is stuff you would never really need to swap out unless it broke. The keyboard and trackpad on most lenovo laptops ive worked on come out with two or three screws. Its not a big deal to work on.

          Framework seems to be solving very few actual problems with mobile computers. The USBC adapter crap just seems like a gimmick to sell computerst to people who apparently need to change their ram and keypads all the time.

          They’re not doing anything really interesting especially when it comes to modular GPUs inlaptosps as the only modern spec for that seems to be mxm and honestly I haven’t seen any current gen laptops with an mxm socket.

          • morrowind@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            You clearly haven’t bought an ultrabook recently.

            Not to mention most of that is stuff you would never really need to swap out unless it broke.

            That’s the whole point

            • krolden@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 years ago

              I haven’t bought any but ive worked on plenty. Yes some aredifficult to work on but the main issue is part availability which you’ll run into on any modern portable. Its nice framework seems to want to solve that but adding more parts that can fail is not the answer.The pro:con ratio isn’t enough for me to recommend this laptop to anyone especially normal users. Maybe if they supported coreboot along with plans to support different architectures down the line but I have yet to hear anything from framework suggesting they have any plans for any of that. Adding swappable connector things is even more pointless these days when a USBC/thunderbolt dock makes them pointless obsolete.

              Anyone I know buying a new laptop I always tell them to spend the extra hundred bucks on the extended accidental protection warranty, its entirely worth it.

              • morrowind@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 years ago

                but the main issue is part availability which you’ll run into on any modern portable

                Do you mean like the current supply shortages or finding proprietary parts? If it’s the latter, then framework does solve it.

                Its nice framework seems to want to solve that but adding more parts that can fail is not the answer.

                I don’t understand this, the laptop has no more parts than a normal laptop, they’re just easier to change and repair.

                The pro:con ratio isn’t enough for me to recommend this laptop to anyone especially normal users.

                What are the problematic cons here? I have found it to be very competitive with other laptops in the price range, and that’s before you consider it’s reparability and environmental aspects.

                Maybe if they supported coreboot along with plans to support different architectures down the line

                I don’t see how these are useful for normal users.

                Adding swappable connector things is even more pointless these days when a USBC/thunderbolt dock makes them pointless.

                I think about this the other way around, since framework has these expansion cards, you no longer have to bother with dongles and docks. Even apple of all companies realized this and brought back a multitude of ports to the macbook, though of course, you can’t choose them like you can on framework. There’s no particular downside to consumer for this. At worst, they’re just a another part that can be replaced when they fail.

                • krolden@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 years ago

                  Do you mean like the current supply shortages or finding proprietary parts? If it’s the latter, then framework does solve it.

                  Sorry but trackpads and keyboards don’t fail enough to justify making them ‘easier to swap’ (which is already easy enough in a lot of systems) and memory/storage are just as easy to swap as in any other system (granted they’re not soldered on)

                  I don’t understand this, the laptop has no more parts than a normal laptop, they’re just easier to change and repair.

                  what? it adds a bunch of those usb-c/tb modules. That’s a bunch of extra parts that only work in the framework laptop. There’s plenty of usb-c/tb adapters in the world already. No need to make yet another adapter, especially if it’s only compatible with framework notebooks.

                  What are the problematic cons here? I have found it to be very competitive with other laptops in the price range, and that’s before you consider it’s reparability and environmental aspects.

                  By pros I mean anything really new and interesting. By cons I mean things like security vulnerabilities that are baked into most modern laptops. I don’t see how framework is any more environmentally friendly than anything else, it just has not been in existence for enough time to see exactly how long they last.

                  I don’t see how these are useful for normal users.

                  because many normal users don’t know what’s good for them, especially regarding security.

                  I think about this the other way around, since framework has these expansion cards, you no longer have to bother with dongles and docks. Even apple of all companies realized this and brought back a multitude of ports to the macbook, though of course, you can’t choose them like you can on framework. There’s no particular downside to consumer for this. At worst, they’re just a another part that can be replaced when they fail.

                  this feels like a step backwards IMO. the best thing about the usb-c/tb standard is that it works with a multitude of EXTERNAL devices.

                  when you say framework will make less waste, i implore you to explain how this isn’t wasteful

                  edit: it looks like they’re going to be implementing coreboot at some point, which is always a good thing.

                  Previous experience with coreboot, Tianocore, Zephyr, or other open source firmware or RTOS platforms. https://jobs.lever.co/framework/4c33ea5e-5580-4eaa-ac84-0b2651caf76b

    • morrowind@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      Framework wasn’t founded to push free software, but rather repairable hardware. I don’t know what you were expecting.

      Plus if you were following them, you would know they had linux info from the beginning, it was just not put in a simple page like this yet.

      (And why is it two years late)?

      • krolden@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        They should go hand in hand since they are supposed to have the same core philosophyy.

    • americanwaste@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      It’s listed as “medium difficulty” due to newer hardware in the laptop not being fully compatible with the kernel shipped in that old version of Ubuntu. I believe 22.04 is compatible out of the box.

      I had to use a Debian sid nightly installer to set up Debian on my laptop, no big deal for me but for someone new to Linux I can see why that might be off-putting.

  • Projjal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Once again, a laptop which follows very good design principles but very high in price.

    • morrowind@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      It’s easier to start at this price point. If it is successful, you will likely see cheaper versions. Nothing like what we have now however, as making cheap throwaway laptops is against their mission.