• wander1236@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    200
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m pretty sure it’s saying you can’t turn left onto the road to the left of the intersection. Looks like some pretty bad road design.

    • bleistift2@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      1 year ago

      I understand the intent from your graphic, but given the signage, I would not have known what they expected of me.

      • someguy3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The painting on the road should indicate a 45° left instead of 90° left.

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              True, although since you’re specifically referring to the angle indicated by the painting on the road, referring to the angle of the painted arrow itself would be clearer.

              • someguy3@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                ? I’m saying the painting on the road should be painted as 45° instead of its current 90°.

                • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I think they’re saying the arrow would be drawn at a 135° angle compared to the “vertical” base.

    • Decoy321@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re absolutely correct. I just thought it made for a funny photo. It’s very on brand for this city to do dumb shit like this.

      • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve been confused and made dangerous choices in traffic for less stupid reasons. Not trying to deflect all blame but considering the lowest common denominator, road construction and signs really need to pay much more attention to the limits of the human brain.

        Half of us have an IQ below 100 and we could be driving in darkness, with rain pouring down and facing traffic that shines its headlights into our eyes. The road needs to have an affordance that suggests to the driver how to drive correctly, instead of causing confusion when you already have a lot of traffic to keep track of.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bad road design for sure, but the sign still could be better. For example they could make a custom sign, draw the intersection and mark explicitly that you can’t turn to Oakwood.

  • helmet91@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Apart from what some commenters already pointed out (about the orientation of the roads there), I’m not sure how it’s going in the US, but in Europe, we have a hierarchy, where the sign on a pole takes precedence over the sign painted on the road.

    The hierarchy is:

    1. Police officer’s hand signs
    2. Traffic lights
    3. Signs on a pole
    4. Signs painted on the road

    According to this, you cannot turn left, even though it looks like a left turning lane.

    Is there such a thing in the US?

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is there such a thing in the US?

      Yeah.

      1. Whatever the heck I want, because “ma freedom”
      2. Police officer’s hand signs
      3. Traffic lights
      4. Signs on a pole
      5. Signs painted on the road
    • bleistift2@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      in Europe, we have a hierarchy

      This is definitely not true for all of Europe. In Germany, for instance, signs on roads have equal precedence to signs on poles.

          • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Here in Finland we just wait for snow, then you can’t see the painted one.

            Which is why it was such a great idea to replace our solid “you can’t pass here” lines from their old bright yellow to EU matching white so that that self driving cars understand them correctly. Which during the winter means both of us or the machines can’t see shit.

        • bleistift2@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s the neat part: They don’t. At least I have never seen confusing signage/markings.

            • bleistift2@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              In Germany we actually test people before we let them drive cars. If you’re from the US, this concept might be unfamiliar :D

              • shasta@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                This has nothing to do with the drivers, and more to do with municipal workers putting up signage.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Sometimes construction makes for unexpected detours.

    (I should probably mention that it’s also a dead end road, so no backing out)

    • Decoy321@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      For real. It’s not even the dumbest shit I’ve seen today. Someone missed an entrance onto i95, so they drove up the offramp intended for the opposite direction. Got 50ft before an oncoming car made them realize their mistake.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I overheard someone in a court house trying to argue with who I assumed was their assigned counsel that it’s totally legal to enter on an off ramp, as long as you’re going in reverse.

    • Decoy321@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. I assume that’s why they didn’t bother doing the proper signage.

      Pa la pinga.

  • willya@lemmyf.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems the mildly infuriating part is the left out information.

  • _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    many signs should really be treated as suggestions. so many roads here with zero fucking business being 35 here