The device known as shoyu-tai (or soy-sauce snapper in Japanese) was invented in 1954 by Teruo Watanabe, the founder of Osaka-based company Asahi Sogyo, according to a report from Japan’s Radio Kansai.

It was then common for glass and ceramic containers to be used but the advent of cheap industrial plastics allowed the creation of a small polyethylene container in the shape of a fish, officially named the “Lunch Charm”.

The invention quickly spread around Japan and eventually worldwide, and it is estimated that billions have been produced.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 days ago

    The “fish-shaped” is rather irrelevant. The point is that it is a single -use plastic thing. With very little content in relation to the plastic used.

    • Lumisal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      I thought it would have been very relevant.

      It looks like a fish lure.

      If this is floating around at sea I don’t see why other fish (and maybe certain sea birds?) wouldn’t think it’s prey, and it even has a bright red indicator that makes it easy to spot.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Only relevant for countries that still “recycle” plastics by throwing them into the sea.

        • ammonium@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          Some thrash will end up in nature no matter what you do, especially small and light items. That’s why it’s good practice to design packaging do that it does minimal harm if it ends up in nature.

  • Lexam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    4 days ago

    Those are cute and I can see how they would be popular. And I see why they should also be banned. I live in the Midwest and I’m not sure I have seen these. Ours just comes in a little sauce packet.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah but as another person from the American Midwest, the article seems to indicate south Australia is moving to the packets we have as they’re larger and use less plastic, though the goal is for bulk soy sauce in refillable containers

        • Hrothgar59@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          In Australia we have these or the packets, for take away. You don’t use them for dine in, we have larger refillable glass/plastic containers for that.

      • catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Kind of but it’s still a fraction of the waste created. Not perfect but I’d say the polyethylene ones take up 5 to 10 times more space in a landfill or ocean.

    • BeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      yeah, i’m thinking about our taco bell sauce packets. would they put them in little soy sauce bottles at every table? little cholula bottles with the cute wooden stoppers? what would they do if they couldn’t bribe lobby their way out of this?

  • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    A Spanish company (I imagine there are a few worldwide) develops compostable bioplastic containers using PLA, polylactic acid, the most used plastic in 3D printing, in food safe formulations. I suppose there are limitations on what it can contain, and I don’t know if soy sauce is compatible. I know that it’s used for single serving olive oil, for example. There are challenges, like storage life, but it’s a good start.

    I do a lot of 3D printing. Printing PLA things for food storage is not recommended, not because of PLA, but because filaments often have modifiers to enhance certain properties that may not be food safe, and because contact with materials and parts, like extrusion nozzles may add impurities that are probably not food safe…

    • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      4 days ago

      Keep in mind that PLA also leaks microplastics into food and could also be considered a risk to health just like other plastics.

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        Aren’t these biodegradable, though? I imagine the body would eventually process them, unlike hydrocarbon based plastics.

        • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          “Biodegradable” doesn’t mean “biodegradable in the conditions in the human body.” Lots of ‘green’ plastics are only compostable at a fairly high temperature (120F/50C) and with specific bacteria present.

    • MrQuallzin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The hard part about PLA is that while it is biodegradable, it’s only in certain conditions/facilities who are set up for it, and it’s not very common around the country. I’m all for what the company is doing, and I already do see a lot of PLA products in fast food (like soda cups), but it doesn’t mean much if we don’t have the facilities to properly dispose of it.

      Source: I do a modest amount of 3D printing

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m definitely not a polymer expert, I also have my information from what I read as a hobbyist. My take is that while PLA will compost in commercial facilities, it will eventually biodegrade in a reasonable time frame, with minor impact to nature. Better than the alternatives, I guess.

        • Pyr@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          How does it biodegrade though?

          Just like disintegrate into tiny plastic molecules that we can no longer see but it’s still plastic? Or does it degrade as far as becoming the individual components that made up the plastic and can be recycled and used by things in nature?

          • Cort@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 days ago

            Pla is poly lactic acid, so it breaks down into lactic acid and then further into water and CO2 with heat and bacteria exposure.

          • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I don’t know. As I mentioned elsewhere I’m not a chemical engineer, but I imagine that being made from starches, it may be decomposed into digestible compounds. Just guessing here.

    • dlatch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Unfortunately while PLA is technically biodegradable, it requires very specific conditions that can only be achieved in dedicated facilities. So it’s not like you can throw it in the composting bin and be done with it. It will also survive for a long time in nature.

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Sure, but PLA will eventually biodegrade, unlike things like polypropilene or polyethylene, which are incredibly useful precisely because of their imperviousness.

    • arc99@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Some people just don’t appreciate the irony of killing turtles with fish-shaped plastic, what can you do

      PLA isn’t food safe in 3d printing mostly because of layers on a print trap foreign material / bacteria and water can also seep into microscopic gaps into infill and it becomes a breeding ground. I doubt it would be useful for anything squeezy but it might be useful for single use forks and other utensils. But paper / wood can do those things already so I don’t see PLA being much use. For sachets I expect the answer is paper with some kind of biodegradable lining which gives a product a shelf life of a few years but does degrade in time.

      Also, some “biodegradable” products are only compostable in specialist facilities where it can be shredded and broken down with water / heat / pressure. I think PLA is a bit like that. If you print something out of PLA and stick it out in the garden or even toss it into a compost bin it’ll still be there in 10 years although it might be faded, warped & brittle. Maybe it eventually biodegrades but it’s not quick enough.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      PLA is pretty brittle AFAIK. these need to be squeezed, so i’m not sure it’d do… perhaps they could add something to it? but whether that additive would also be compostable… it’d certainly make it non-recyclable

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I used to buy the olive oil containers for a restaurant I owned. They worked quite well. Small single serving cups with a peel off lid. I don’t know if the lids were bioplastic, though.

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nothing is ever produced by them that isn’t bought by someone who should have said no.

        If companies are to blame then that’s the media companies who don’t inform the consumers about their responsibilities but instead sell ads for harmful products.

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Good luck relying on informed customers when customers are too busy living their lives to keep track of a billion different reasons for why they shouldn’t buy one product over another. Also, these are given out at restaurants. Do you recommend refusing to go to a restaurant if they happen to see this dispenser being included there?

          How is making sure millions of people are informed and making the “correct” decision every time a better solution than simply restricting on the supply side?

          • plyth@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            It’s the only way to make a change. Businesses can buy politicians to avoid regulations.

        • turtlesareneat@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          No, you can’t blame consumers for corporations bad behavior, consumers act in their own self interest, not a collective self interest. This is precisely why we have regulations.

  • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    I was thinking about these literally just yesterday. I’m wondering if they could be essentially replaced with something like those wax bottle candies. Maybe not the best for places that reach extreme temperatures but some places could do it without issue.

  • arc99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I’ve never seen these things before but it does seem like a waste of plastic. Even sachets of sauce shouldn’t be handed out in most circumstances, at least for dine-in food in fast food places - use dispensers and paper cups. I wonder if there is a biodegradable sachet material which has a couple of years shelf life but degrades thereafter.

  • HotDayBreeze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    Scrolling by I literally thought “Man, that candy looks delicious, what’s this article about?” And then read the headline… 🫠

    • fartsparkles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      4 days ago

      South Australia will be the first place in the world to ban them under a wider ban on single-use plastics that comes into force on 1 September.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        They aren’t banning the packets tho… I can see how the plastic pouches could be better for the environment than the polypropylene fish tho, but certainly not by much.

        Man, it sounds like the ultimate first-world problem, but how are they gonna get soy sauce with takeout sushi without single-use plastics? I imagine the people who get takeout sushi and the people who have a bottle of soy sauce in their fridge are largely different groups. Not to mention the people who get takeout sushi for lunch at work. This may degrade the takeout sushi experience for all of South Australia.

          • Kirp123@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 days ago

            These companies use plastic because of its weight and ease of manufacturing and I assume it’s also cheaper than glass. The weight may seem a weird metric but when they are shipping billion of them every year it adds up.

            If they were forced to change to glass they would definitely increase the price to compensate.

            • tomiant@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              4 days ago

              I would love to save the world from ecological collapse, but not if I have to pay for it in any way shape of form whatsoever!

          • Eheran@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            Glass is only better when it is reused something like 5 times. Otherwise it is worse, as the energy needed to make it is just so high plus all the shipping.

            • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              True, but at least glass breaks down into sand, and metal caps don’t pollute, they are just unsightly. The plastic cap liners can be made of bioplastics. The energy aspect could be mitigated by mandating 100% renewables in production and transportation, maybe? I know it’s not easy to transition to these, but we don’t have many options.

              As I mentioned in a prior comment, there are companies making bioplastic containers, in commercial production now.

              • Eheran@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 days ago

                Glass is made essentially exclusively with natural gas as the fuel source and there is no easy way to transition to something else to directly use electricity at these scales, conditions and temperatures. Before transitioning such high hanging fruit, we first need to stop burning it to heat homes, which is really easy to replace with electricity.

        • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          I imagine the people who get takeout sushi and the people who have a bottle of soy sauce in their fridge are largely different groups.

          Tbh there’s your answer, fix that. Buy some damn soy sauce, they sell it at the most basic stores.

          But that doesn’t solve the issue for people eating it at a third location, like work, their car, or an unprepared friend’s house, can’t buy bottles of soy for literally everywhere you go “just in case” and such.

          Maybe we still need them for that, but we can also be mindful of our circumstances and prepare/choose appropriately. Would require people to change personally however, so keep waiting lol.

          Hell maybe we just make it common for them to sell little 4oz resealable glass bottles of kikkoman at the Chinese spot, then one can still be unprepared and still get the sauce there (though it’d be cheaper if they prepare next time), and whatever sauce isn’t used is retainable. Still not perfect since those bottles have plastic tops, but it’s something! Maybe make the caps out of hemp plastic for added bonus?

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          If my wife wasn’t soy intolerant I’d have a bottle of soy sauce in my fridge (her issues with soy mean I really only get east Asian food when going out) and if she liked fish I’d get takeout sushi sometimes. Though honestly if she liked fish and could eat soy sauce I’d’ve learned to make sushi by now, so maybe I’m not the default here

        • tomiant@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Well, they claim capitalism is the best driver there is for invention, so this should be sorted before Wednesday!

        • Duckingold@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Banning the soy sauce packets would force a mindset change. A new solution would be restaurants having the full size bottles and when you pick up, you can bring a Tupperware to fill.

    • phant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      A decent question. Especially if this ban allows the ripper pouch style single serve sauces.
      I have collected a tonne of the fish shaped bad boys at river clean ups, so maybe they’re somehow worse. Tbh takeaway sushi could improve in a lot of ways to reduce single use plastics, so kinda funny that the cute fish copped it.

      • dustycups@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        If it hasn’t already been broken down into microplastics yet and it’s floating around in its whole form, then other organisms that eat fish that size could think it is a fish and then eat it,” Wootton said.

        And:

        “Since they are quite a thick plastic, it does take quite a while for them to degrade.”

  • renrenPDX@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m not defending the use but should mention that these are convenient over traditional sauce packets. They allow precise application in a droplet form, don’t spill everywhere, and can be closed with the included cap.

      • zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Portability and cost.

        I don’t support single use plastics but saying no benefit is just willfully ignorant and causes alternatives to fail for missing the point.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          saying no benefit is just willfully ignorant and causes alternatives to fail

          It also plays into the conservative point of view that everybody who gives a shit about the biosphere is just as ignorant as they are, and that the reasons for taking away their plastic straws and grocery bags have to do with evil communist america-destruction rather than preventing things like micro plastics in the organs of developing fetuses and global climate change.

          Ignorance and pretending a problem doesn’t exist is like step 0 of most conservative policies.

        • Wahots@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          It could just be waxed paper/waxed cardboard like the milk cartons of yore, but small. A lot of this stuff has been around long before plastics, and we got by just fine :)

        • Chais@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Portability is a fair point, but I feel like we shouldn’t count cost, since that’s the line of thinking that got us into this mess.

          • zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Unfortunate reality while we still have capitalism. Plastic bags are banned where I am but they still show up regularly