• @iortega
    link
    fedilink
    92 years ago

    Is this really a “proof”? I can’t say I’m a Signal hate, but neither a lover, however I’m not sure if signal itself explaining why signal is privacy friendly is enough to consider their service and products privacy friendly. It might just be my opinion though. Too used to companies providing equivalent arguments.

    • Jedrax
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      I think the point is that they were ordered to return records by law, and Signal made a legally binding response that they don’t have any records. They are demonstrating that they actually have no information on users. Would that be considered proof? Yes. It absolutely would be.

      I have to ask, did you read the court order and the response? Not just the summary they wrote about.

      • @iortega
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        I think I did. I might have not understood it. However, is that response enough? Shouldn’t Signal have some kind of audit by authorities to confirm it is true what they responded?