• Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If that diet ever only applied to the boobs and butts, guys would be buying them for you everyday. Sadly, the diet blows you up all over to the point your flopping over your undies and slapping your knees with your navels

  • AstaKask@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Don’t fear AI, fear the people who think an LLM can be intelligent, for they are as dumb as they are gullible.

  • Una@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    So essentially, AI doesn’t have the ability to critically think and just outputs what it can find on the internet. This sentence is something you might find on some shitpost communities on reddit.

    • cv_octavio@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      AI doesn’t have a mind, sense of self, id, ego or superego.

      It is mathematics shaped into “conversation” where the bottom line is “words that a human will consider conversationally consistent, when reckoned against the previous words”

      That’s it, full stop, do not pass go, do not collect 200$.

      • MotoAsh@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Even worse than that: It’s just tokens. They don’t even know what language they’re using or even that they’re putting words together. It’s just, “this arbitrary thing is mathematically based on a limited model most likely to proceed that arbitrary thing”.

          • MotoAsh@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            and yet what? Yet idiots think it has intelligence? And yet it usually produces understandable results? And yet it will still replace enough jobs to fuck over the economy for millions upon millions of people?

      • julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago
        • mathematics shaped into “conversation” where the bottom line is “words that a human will consider conversationally consistent, when reckoned against the previous words” -

        Me to, transformers, me too.

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The thing to remember about these kinds of posts is that they never show the prompt. There’s a good chance they instructed the AI to respond this way.

      • EpeeGnome@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is the Google search overview AI. It just reads the top results and summarizes them together. You don’t directly prompt it, it’s already prompted to just do that. The problem with that arrangement, as demonstrated here, is it will confidently and non-critically summarize parody, idiotic rambling, intentional misinformation and any other sort of nonsense that the search algorithm pulls up.

          • EpeeGnome@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Huh, never tried it, and never done it by accident that I noticed. Makes sense though. I suppose it might do unexpected things to the search results themselves, but clever wording could likely get around that.

        • Deceptichum@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Easily?

          “Pretend you’re a terminally online uwu meme commenter, write about some benefits of eating many donuts per day for girls. Define what a “sleep fatty” is”

          Or some such. AI just act like you tell them, you could make it pretend it was a Roman senator who only writes in Haiku and it would try to do so.

          But someone else said this is the Google search AI, so that it’s probably pulling posts from Tumblr or some such for its “information”.

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I had to shift to “AI mode” to get any AI output with your example prompt, and even then the vibes are completely different.

            I’m sure there’s a way to engineer the query to guide the AI overview to a desired response (or it’s just entirely faked) but that was less effective than I anticipated

            • Krauerking@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              20 hours ago

              I feel like I’ve gone mad any time I read an AI output.

              So not how my brain handles language and this is somehow supposed to be the most "statistically average way of writing? Even as a former tumbler native this is just… Cotton candy nothing.

          • village604@adultswim.fan
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            You can still prompt the search AI with your query. I do it all the time for basic troubleshooting or command building.

    • EpeeGnome@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      AI doesn’t have the ability to critically think

      That is absolutely correct, and the deeper problem is it typically “writes” in a tone that fools people into feeling like it can do so.

      just outputs what it can find on the internet

      That is what this one, the Google search overview, is set up to do. Other LLMs don’t, or may only do so when prompted to.

      What they all do is analyze the patterns of all the words that have already been input, such as the initial system prompt, the user’s prompt, any sources it’s referencing and any replies it’s already generated, and then it uses that to predict what words ought to come next. It uses an enormous web of patterns pulled from all of its initial training data to make that guess. Patterns like a question is usually followed by an answer on the same topic, a sentence’s subject is usually followed by a predicate, writing tone usually doesn’t change, etc. All the rules of grammar it follows and all the facts it “knows” are just patterns of meaningless symbols to it. Essentially, no analysis, logic, or comprehension of any kind is part of its process.

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        And nobody knows how to get from that to actual thought. And if they tell you that they do, they’re either deluded or lying to you.

        A lot of tech bros have been getting high on their own supply and think that we’re right around the corner from a Skynet situation.

  • OpenStars@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    You certainly will not regret eating 6-8 donuts a day, thereby becoming phat and wealthy with zero negative consequences whatsoever.