• Sluggles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Zero tolerance” policy on fighting. Any “active” participation resulted in automatic suspension. That part sounds fine, but active participation included things like holding up your hands in self defense or trying to push the person sitting on your chest while punching you in the face off of you.

    • Salix@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really don’t understand why schools have this rule (at least in many places in the US). Are they trying to teach you to not practice self defense and just let it happen? Doesn’t sound like a great thing to teach.

      • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s easy for the administrators. No investigation, no attempt to understand what happened.

        • deejay4am@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Since the late 90s, school admins have become increasingly “police state light”; multiple vice principals with walkie-talkies, metal detectors, 3 hour after school detention, saturday detention, in-school suspension (you go sit in a room in silence for literally the entire school day), and zero tolerance. Imagine getting punched in the face and THEN being expelled for it. And I’m not even talking about “rough inner-city schools” or whatever; this shit happened in the Berkshires.

          Of course, all their security theatre commands a budget increase and attempts to instill a sense of fear of the state into students.

          We’re worried about school board meetings being taken over now but the administrations went full right wing fascist 30 years ago.

          • Boinketh@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            And nobody cares because once they get through school, they never have to deal with it again. It’s an endless cycle of suffering, and nobody who is capable of stopping it is willing to do so.

      • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Funnily enough it had the opposite effect at my school

        “If I’m getting suspended regardless, I’m going to stop it here and now.”

        Yeah they had to repaint some walls due to blood on a number of occasions. And tear carpet out.

        It’s was like the fucking thunderdome the moment shit started going down at my school.

      • derf82@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because bad parents. Kids who are bullies usually have parents who are bullies, and even when their kid is the instigator, they will defend their kid and bully teachers and administrators into lifting punishment. Zero tolerance means that discretion is removed and everyone is punished.

        The changes in parents the last few decades is why schools are so awful.

    • Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I ran afoul of this.

      Someone came up and suckerpunched the absolute fuck out of me from behind, Was someone who I never even interacted with, commented towards, or even thought about. I still think, to this day, he just wanted to look like a bad ass by hitting the biggest kid in the grade.

      Because they used a crutch to get around due to a gimpy leg, and because I was over a foot taller, I was deemed the aggressor… and no amount of witnesses saying otherwise would convince the principle of my innocence. and because the office was so convinced of it, no one in my family believed me either, so no one fought against it. I had to complete a program for “violent” teens before I was allowed to return to school… a program that was little more than slave labor in the hottest not-summer-break months, where I got accused of being a (gay slur) because only (Gay slur)'s drink their drinks the way I did, apparently. Was a super happy fun time learning experience.

      I totally don’t still carry the rage and bitterness about it to this day at all. Nope. not at all.

    • vagrantprodigy@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I always told my kid to fight back, and I’d have their back. More parents should be that way. Same way too many kids get beat up in HS because they were afraid to fight back.

    • PorkTaco@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Zero tolerance anything is just lazy and worthless. Only reason to implement is so you don’t have to think or acknowledge any nuance. Admin can just shrug their shoulders and go “Sorry nothing I can do. Zero tolerance.”

  • yiliu@informis.land
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Back when I was in high school (in public school), chess caught on in a big way. Chess. It was the weirdest thing. It was a public school in a small farming town, and pre-Nerd Renaissance, so picture a stereotypical 80s or 90s school where jocks were top of the food chain–and then picture those same jocks in their letter jackets rushing to the library on their free periods to take turns playing chess. They set up tournaments and kept track of win/loss ratios and talked about chess strategies in the hallways.

    So obviously something had to be done…I guess? The school started making rules and posting them around the school: one game per student per day. One game at a time in the lounge. No chess in classrooms or in the library! The chess board must be returned to the lounge supervisor between games, then signed out by the next person wanting to play–not just passed willy-nilly from one student to another! No outside chess boards allowed!

    That pretty much strangled the chess fad. The jocks went back to stuffing nerds in lockers and sneaking out to smoke behind the school, and the chess boards returned to the shelf by the lounge supervisor, where they collected dust.

    Problem…solved? The whole thing was pretty surreal.

  • wsweg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    I always thought the no hats rule was really stupid. The teachers enforcing the rule was more distracting from the lesson than someone wearing a hat.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Security guard at the school was out to get me. To this day I have no idea why. He’d let my lowlife friends get away with murder.

      Taking me to the dean for wearing a hat, he’s talking to another student, wearing a baseball hat. These guys were the same height, not like he missed it.

      • pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So after they stopped allowing hats, the assholes were so outsmarted that they resigned themselves to no longer causing any form of shit or harassment?

  • ronnypopiel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    In 5th grade they defined every kid that can speak another language as ESL (English as a second language) even if you spoke English perfectly. Then they put all of the ESL kids in a different class on the opposite side of the school. The result was that the school became de facto racially segregated with all Asian and Latino kids on one side and all white kids on the other. It’s not like it served a purpose anyway since none of the teachers could speak anything other than English.

  • Shambling Shapes@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    A couple got caught behind the high school. Girl giving the blowie was made to apologize to the school over the PA system and then “encouraged” to go to a different school where she would “fit in better”. Boy got no punishment.

    • LANCESTAAAA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, my high school had a similar issue. There was an “alternative” school that was basically worse in every capacity and every deviant student or pregnant student was “encouraged” to transfer. The wild thing was you would still walk the stage with everyone from the initial high school so graduation day was like 20% people you didn’t even know or thought they moved away.

  • Boggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    A private school I used to go to banned Listerine breath strips, the ones you put on your tongue, because too many kids were using them.

    • Mothra@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What country was this??? And how did they enforce it??? Sounds near impossible

  • Thurgo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    No jackets. My school was using a wing of a building under construction as additional classrooms and you had to take a bus from the main building. In the winter you could not wear or carry your jacket around prior to your class in this building, so you had to spend your passing time visiting your locker to pick up your jacket and hope you make it to the bus in time to not be late to your class. The school was not small so I was frequently late or didn’t wear a jacket.

    • ghost_bird@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wow I can’t imagine… my school was so cold during the winter I wouldn’t have made it.

  • nparkinglot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wish I could remember the specifics but my high school had an extremely ridiculous dress code policy at one point. Mostly targeting girls, of course, but also had weird shit like “no large/long coats.”

    What I do remember perfectly though, is that a friend of mine and I, angrily pouring over the details of the stupid dress code, realized that capes were perfectly fine according to the code as written. So we both got huge capes and that was like a whole year of high school.

  • NakariLexfortaine@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    My high school had a rule about the “difficulty” of books you could read. You weren’t supposed to read too high “above your grade”. I assumed this rule was something with the school library and their Accelerated Reader program.

    Nope! Tried to give me ISS because I was reading “Screwjack”, which I brought from home. It wasn’t even in class! I was a fucking junior. A high school junior should be able to handle Hunter S. Thompson.

    According to them it was “college level” and therefore I shouldn’t be reading it. My father raised absolute hell in that office. Don’t think they tried enforcing that rule again.

    They also tried bitching about girls tops until a group of very pissed off redneck fathers had questions about how they were touching the students to measure the width.

    • Admetus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I get the fact that reading too high above your grade means you may be way over your head in vocabulary and grammar, but it’s not entirely applicable to everyone. I read Pride and Prejudice and one friend said I sounded posh from the language I accidentally started using. So if a high schooler or junior high schooler can handle it, why not?

      • iByteABit [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If a kid is truly over their head with a book, it won’t be long until they get bored and quit, unless they’re just trying to impress someone and aren’t interested in the book itself.

        Kids should be allowed to unlimited learning and curiosity, this spark you have as a child is very powerful if you let it happen and nurture it instead of trying to fit all students in an iron cast thinking that you know what’s best for them.

    • DaleGribble88@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The AR Reading program that was popular in the early 2000s was an absolute disaster. It basically killed my love of reading for almost 10 years. They wouldn’t let me read books “above my level” based on some BS test that used timed reading. I wasn’t dumb, I just sub-vocalized when I read like a lot of people, so I read slowly. Read slow, don’t finish the test, grade poor, so “no books for you!” said the school.

  • x4740N@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not sure if it was a rule since I think ot was temporary but putting a whole year level in detention because a few students from that year level broke the rule, that really passed me off even though my year level wasn’t being punished for anything

    This school didn’t care about students at all with teachers stereotyping and playing favouritism

  • Woodyboye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    My school had a semi-loose dress code. Polos and button ups and the like. Also hoodies were allowed but what kind was usually based on the person who saw you in it. The one thing that never made sense to me was that girls couldnt show their shoulders. Wasnt an issue with guys, hell in weight training class guys and girls could wear tank tops. But anywhere else, even when school was out, the smallest amount of shoulder could get a girl wrote up. Even as a guy, this shit made no sense. It wasnt like some guy was gonna get aroused by a little shoulder so it didnt make much sense to play that “distracting guys” argument. And almost every teacher enforced this. My friend went on a long winded rant about it to me while waiting on the bus and ever since then its been confusing.

  • LrdThndr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    At my high school, the administration banned the color and word “fuchsia” (kind of a purple-ish, pink-ish color).

    For some reason, the senior class (year 12, the class one year above me at the time) had become obsessed with the color/word. They had taken to wearing fuchsia shirts with the word “fuchsia” on them. On a given day, you’d likely see a few dozen of these shirts roaming the halls with students inside them.

    The ban came because, allegedly, somebody had made up a story about a Mexican hooker named “Fuchsia” (because that’s a Spanish name, right?) that was the supposed inspiration of the color craze.

    So naturally, the admins banned the color and any mention of the word. Using the word “fuchsia” in any context, or wearing the color in any way was three days in in-school-suspension (during-the-day detention where you sat in a cubicle with literally nothing to do - you weren’t allowed to read, no schoolwork, or anything — just stare at the wall for 8 hours). Second offense was a week out of school suspension. Third meant you failed your year and had to repeat the grade.

    So, the seniors started wearing other obscure colors with the name printed on the shirt. “Indigo” “Chartreuse” “Vermillion”. Every single one of these colored shirts had the name of the color, and the words “You can’t ban all the colors” underneath.

    It was by far the dumbest ass rule I’d ever seen.

  • vagrantprodigy@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Our idiot principal for my first two years tried to come up with his own rule that shirts had to be tucked in. The written rule added the caveat “if it was designed to be tucked in”. I purposely bought shirts that said they were not intended to be tucked in just so I could be a problem, and then made sure other people know which ones to buy.

    • funnyletter@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      My middle school required all shirts to be tucked in and they meant ALL SHIRTS. They went around making kids tuck in sweatshirts. It was dumb. And also racist because it was the 90s and the rule was made in response to baggy clothing being popular especially amongst black kids, so they considered large untucked shirts to be gang related.