Most of the communities are on one instance i.e .ml. Should we spin up more instances and start spreading communities either by location, interests, etc? Maybe, I am wrong but do mod/s who run the communities understand the idea of “decentralized social networks” or this is just to get few brownie points to start the community and increase the traffic? Please correct me if I am wrong.

No offence, just an observation.

  • Dessalines
    link
    fedilink
    202 years ago

    Its very natural for fediverse projects to have a few of the starting instances dominate, at least at the beginning. Its not necessarily that hosting requirements are heavy, its just that beta software under rapid development needs frequent updates.

    This is the instance run by us devs, and we can’t do more than encourage people to start their own instances, and for others to federate with them. There are no ads on lemmy, so we don’t gain anything by having more users. More traffic on this instance is actually detrimental to us, because it gives us more moderation work, whereas we’d prefer to do development.

    • Sean Tilley
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Maybe it wouldn’t be a bad idea to find a few other instances, and promote them and/or some of their communities on your project site? It might be a good small step towards helping people discover other places to sign up or connect with.

  • @LemonWedge@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    152 years ago

    I feel like the best way to get this off the ground is to really put up as much new content as possible. I’ve been slacking recently by not being on in a while, but I really need to make the effort in contributing.

    With more contribution comes more people.

    • @dogmuffins@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      102 years ago

      I think this is on point. IIRC this was a major problem with reddit in the early days, admins had to post a lot of content.

      • @sibachian@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        that’s generally how you get a community rolling. yogthos feels like he’s been almost the sole contributor for a while.

  • @zksmk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    14
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    There are benefits to each community being local and server specific (moderation, culture, community), but there are also benefits to the idea of a single community being spread over multiple instances (decentralisation, resilience, activity/reach). There are reasons why few people want to start a or post content to a community on a random server, and most people opt for the biggest one. There’s relatively few people as it is already and creating duplicates, fragmentation and inevitable manual content replication doesn’t seem like the way to go about things.

    This is why I like the idea of a potential future feature where on top of /c/acommunity we would also get a /t/atopic that aggregates all the communities with the same name from all the instances into one place/feed. This would NEED to be optional and the community mods would have to have an optin/optout feature for their community being included in the /t/topic feed. I think that would make both sides happy.

    As it is, I don’t see having active communities on other instances likely, unfortunately. Individual accounts can work just fine from other instances, and the content gets auto replicated, but the parent hub is still in one place.

      • @nutomic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        You mean that a single community would be hosted on multiple instances? Its a nice idea, but I think its impossible to do in Activitypub. Would like to be proven wrong though.

        • TmpodM
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          Yeah, I believe that’s what they meant. It would be neat, but don’t know AP to be able to comment on that.

        • @zksmk@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I might be wrong, and correct me if I am, because I don’t really know how AP works, but I feel like this functionality already exists, sort of. Mostly because the suggestion wasn’t really a cross instance community, with everything that it entails (subs, mods, bans, etc…) but more like a custom filtered feed.

          If you currently go to the All page you see different posts from different communities from different instances. If this was filtered by community name (minus instance) it would effectively be the suggestion. Just have this filter functionality accessible through instance.tld/t/insertfiltertopichere

          One key point though: as I understand it, for posts from any remote community to appear on the All page at least one home user needs to subbed to the community, it’s not enough for at least one user to be subbed to any other community on the remote instance? In that case, for this idea to be effective, at least one user each needs to be manually subbed to all the individual same named communities, or I feel like there could be a home bot user that subs to all the communities on the white listed instances.

          I hope I’m explaining this well. Would this work? Sounds hacky, but looks to me like it would work.

          • @nutomic@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            52 years ago

            Something like a multireddit? That should work, and it probably wouldnt require any federation changes. You can open an issue for it.

    • @starfish@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      You mean, if both a and b communities agreed ie both have these feature enabled they can share a topic/s among them?

  • CHEF-KOCH
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Decentralization will never work for the mass because there are simple reasons for that. This is what I call the Nitter effect. We have the same there, millions of people using and starving those free services to death, but no one or only 20 people self-host their own.

    People do not self-host because

    • It requires more effort and time that you need to spend to initial setup everything, instead of joining existence instances.
    • Most are not experts and just updating the software is often not enough, which possible leads into more vulnerabilities and data leaks and breaches. We have that more and more.
    • People do not know how to do it because the platform that wants to expand do not provide any guides on how to really do it.
    • Maintenance is a bish, that is one of the reasons other platforms went down e.g. Ruqqus.
    • Why should people start their own no-name server when there are already bigger ones. Like trying to compete against Twitter, Google and Co. it is not possible…

    If you want to expand, you need to provide the following

    • Dead simple instructions, step-by-step on how to self-host and maintain your own instance, and I really mean step-by-step. Docs are not enough, you need to provide pictures because the average user does not read anything anymore.
    • You need to make people aware that you need several people, not just one guy that maintains it. Maintenance will suck up your life, and people are not willingly to do that alone for nothing in return. You also require mods etc.
    • You need to advertise and describe why it would be interesting or important to start your own community, server etc.
    • Dessalines
      link
      fedilink
      102 years ago

      I will continue to try to make our install docs as simple as possible, and am open to suggestions on how to make that easier.

      The ansible install right now is extremely easy to do, you can set up a server within a few minutes.

    • @zksmk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I’m sure some people don’t enjoy hearing about this regarding the potential distant future of a successful mainstream fediverse, but if someone puts ads on their instance, that’s all incentive they need to maintain it. I mean, yeah, sure, it’s ads, but it’s decentralised, and therefore better in some ways. It’s that, or freemium features, pick your poison. IF the fediverse is to succeed as a non-niche platform, and not run by hobbyists. Which of course nobody said needs to be true.

      And we don’t have to speculate about all this, mass federated platforms already exist, they’re called email.

      • Brad McGarr
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        I would rather see people be asked to contribute towarsa costs or the instances run by community organizations.

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I think having more instances would be great, especially now that it’s possible to federate across them. A big question is how to ensure that instances are spun up in a sustainable fashion. One common problem I see with Mastodon instances is that they’re often short lived. This can cause more harm than good since people create accounts and get invested in the community, and then it disappears when the person running the server no longer has the time or the will to keep doing it.

    It might be good to create some sort of an organization that would allow people to pool effort needed for operating the servers. So, if somebody needs help with administration or they want to pass it on to somebody else then it’s easy for people to connect. This could even be a community on the main instance.

    • TmpodM
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      That last ideal is actually quite nice! Lemmy could use that for sure :)

      I run lemmy.pt and atm I have no intention of ever stopping, but you never know what the future brings and sometimes passing the management to someone else might be hard. A respectable org that help that transition could be really neat.

      • seb
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        I second that! I run two mid-sized mastodon instances and definitely see the appeal of a fedi guild.

  • Gritty
    link
    fedilink
    112 years ago

    I often see the talk about expansion but I don’t think even this server has hit its limit of channel overcrowding. I see it more of cells dividing, one instance splitting off when enough folks decide they can make their own “colony”. Otherwise, it’ll be like a few instances I’ve seen around - 3 folks posting on every sub.

    Ultimately people want to be a part of a community, but only one that’s not too small that its boring or too large that you’re lost in the mix and folks are annoying. This instance seems to have that mix right now, and as it expands I hope folks break off in large groups to expand the community.

    • mtumishi
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      Don’t forget the whole idea of federation is that an instance with 10 members is not limited to those members only on content sources. I like it when more instances interlink and therefore reduce the centralization risks while keeping network benefits.

  • TmpodM
    link
    fedilink
    102 years ago

    More instances for sure. I think country/language specific instances are an easy and nice way to bring more decentralization and content to the network. Then, domain specific instances like for music, cinema/TV, sports, games, etc would be really nice to have.

    I already run lemmy.pt, but it is pretty small still (and I’m not expecting it to grow a whole lot soon) and so I’d be down to hosting another instance. However, I suppose one person hosting multiple instances kinda goes against the point of decentralization. :/

  • Ravn
    link
    fedilink
    62 years ago

    I think it would be good to decentralise communities so that the same community can be hosted on several servers. It sort of sucks to have a community die because a server goes away.

    • @starfish@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Do you know, if it is possible to have same community on multiple instances? and not just a same name. Or, we end up having two communities with same name and different content eventually?

      • TmpodM
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        Replicating communities is not possible at the moment. The best you can do is have communities with the same name and staff in different servers. It wouldn’t be ideal for the decentralization of small communities (which can’t be easily subdivided), however, for language specific branches it could be pretty nice.

        • @starfish@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Thanks, sort of make sense. Have to do a bit more reading. Should staff/mods of these communities on different servers have same usernames and/or passwords? Or different for the sake of security, ie if one user gets compromised, all instances will be at risk?

          • TmpodM
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            A user from an instance can be staff on other instances, they don’t have to create different accounts. Ideally you’d have a different rooster of mods on each subcommunity and only keep the same admins.

  • @upperlowerclass@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    62 years ago

    I’m new, just got tired of the ever increasing homogeneity on Reddit. Feels so artificial now. This communities small which is a good thing for maintaining that human feeling maybe? lol. Maybe that sense of community divorced from mass adoption and corporate interest is a good value to uphold. Idk that’s just how I feel rn as I take my morning shit. Glad to be here guys!

    • @starfish@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      I am newb as well. I heard about it before " decentrilized concept", but was to busy in my own world, like most of us. Got tired of mainstream along with pandemic drove me to other side.

      This is awesome concept, need to do some homework.

    • TmpodM
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Glad to have to have you onboard too :D

  • @Akimoto@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    62 years ago

    Maybe we would need marketing campaign and make it appeal to the general audience to have fast expansion. But I am not sure we are ready at the moment.

    It’s really hard to get people actually sign up and stay on it because it’s always a bit of a vicious cycle. People are hesitant to switch because there isn’t much content, then they keep using old platform. Take example with Signal. Feature wise, it is on par with WhatsApp. But when I try to convince people to use it, they always go back to WhatsApp because they already have all their contacts and conversation.

    • @starfish@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      Was on the same boat, took a year to convince wife start using signal. She still uses WhatsApp, saying she has a good content there.

    • TmpodM
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Yup, it’s the first-movers advantage, which sadly is very much real in this domain…

      I think the best approach is to start small and build stuff little by little, instead of trying to reach a very wide audience right away. Good publicity is also key, of course.

  • @starfish@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    Good discussion and valid points everyone. I am actually very surprised, people here are actually for a reason :)))

  • Colorish
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Imho we should make something original. I’m not talking about functions or things like that, but more about quality content and stuff. I created this account from like 10 mins cuz i really liked the fediverse concept already and when I discovered that there was a whole site like that I immediately subscribed, but rn it’s just a cool and depopulated copy of reddit.

    Also we should get rid of the incremental counters (like lemmy.ml/post/120548).