• HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 小时前

    Please collapse in an orderly fashion, form a queue or something. But don’t come up here, we’re full.

  • olbaidiablo @lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 小时前

    He isn’t wrong. All it takes is the right amount of people to be pissed and revolution explodes. If the oligarchs think they have it rough now, wait until they are being lynched in the street by people who haven’t eaten a decent meal in recent memory. Look up 1918 Russia if you don’t believe me.

    • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 小时前

      I somehow feel things have changed. Maybe it’s the internet, lack of education, consumerism, whatever. I hate to say this, bit I feel like a lot of people, when they get hungry, would steal from their neighbours. Far too many folk don’t understand that the wealthy are the author of their suffering and won’t know where to target their anger. Not to mention that oligarchs are hard to catch, whereas your neighbour with a slightly newer car is right there, and may be of a different race. People don’t understand who they should be angry with.

      • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 小时前

        If there is still food to be stolen from your neighbours then things haven’t reached the point of revolt.

        If there is still enough energy to be expended on hating your neighbor, then you haven’t reached the true point of revolt

        When things are truly at their worst, your neighbor has no food to take. Your neighbor has no goods worth stealing. Harming them brings you no food, no money and less energy.

        When things have reached that point, that is when the only option left is revolt and it does not matter what consumerism what gifts are given what lies are said. The only thing left to do is revolt or die. And no group of people will simply choose to die.

  • Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 小时前

    Sure seems like the rich are doing everything they can to see what they can get away with before it pops off.

    • reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 小时前

      and do something to prevent new people from taking their place so the problem doesnt just start again with different people

      • Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 小时前

        Maybe we just need the ever present threat of being eaten should one become too rich to achieve world peace.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 小时前

    If he’s lucky, he might survive it, but if he keeps greeding unrepentantly, he might not

  • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    23 小时前

    Venture capitalist Bradley Tusk told LBC: “If Elon Musk says he needs a trillion dollars because he’s going to solve global hunger or something like that, great, have at it. But I don’t know what you could possibly buy with a trillion dollars that you couldn’t buy with a hundred billion, or probably even $10 billion.”

    Well at least he’s aware of how much money a trillion dollars is and how easy it would be to solve world hunger.

    • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      12 小时前

      He once said that if there was a concrete plan to solve world hunger he would do it. Then a representative of an actual plan to solve world hunger showed up on his Twitter feed and provided him with information and he was like ‘nah’.

      And the plan would only cost a small amount of his fortune. He bought Twitter for much, much more.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 小时前

        I think it was only like 6 billion, right?

        A huge number on its own, but in this context it’s nothing.

        • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 小时前

          He paid 44 billion for Twitter and it took him a few days to raise that much money. He could have been the man to write the cheque to end world hunger and be honored by millions for generations to come (despite all his other bullshit), but he chose not to.

          The world starves not because we cannot feed the hungry, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 小时前

          Yup. The actual sources of world hunger aren’t material but systemic. So it’s not as easy as just “giving everyone food”, but the more complicated “give everyone access to a robust agriculture supply chain”.
          Fortunately, giving 1-2% of people fertilizer and some work animals might be a bit more complicated, it’s significantly cheaper.

      • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        18 小时前

        If your parents left you a home, you’re probably a millionaire too. Many blue collar working folk are millionaires, except if they tried to spend those millions they’d become homeless.

      • meep_launcher@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        22 小时前

        I mean the millionaire class is a grey area between those who are so rich they are completely out of touch with working class realities, and those who were working class who got a break and played a good hand right.

        Personally I don’t really have a problem with millionaires, that’s an amount you can make playing by the rules and not bending them to your own will.

        • TronBronson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 小时前

          It’s also just not a huge wealth disparity. Like having 5-10x more than the average is more tolerable than having 10,000x more than the average. if someone drove a car that was worth 10x more than mine, it would be a new Honda. If they had a house 5x larger it would be a large family home. This actually adjusts to the needs of society.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 小时前

          depends on how they got the money, did the guy come from wealth? if so he might be so detached from everyone else, even as a millionaire. or did he build up his wealth from the ground up, without the help of NEPTOTISM.

          • TronBronson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 小时前

            And there lies the real problem, the handing down of large sums of money. Entrenched wealth and power of an aristocracy. It destroys the meritocracy and the desire to progress society. My grandpa taught me a valuable lesson by giving all his money away. He paid for school, camp, life skills and that was it. True believer in the American dream having secured it for himself. I often wonder what he would think about the current state of the economy. As well as how I would interpret the state of the economy, if I wasn’t living in utter fucking poverty. I would not have the same attachment to social issues if I wasn’t front lines on the war against the poor.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 小时前

      VC usually has 100s of millions or billions. hes probably the one that uses funds from billionaires into his company?